Quantcast
| |  
Food for the Poor Godspy.com: Faith at the Edge

Advertisement

CATEGORIES:     BOOKSBUSINESSCULTUREFAITHISSUESLIFEMOVIESPOLITICSSCIENCE/TECHSPIRITUALITYTVWORLD
John Murphy | 09.15.08

Movies

For This Documentary Tells Me So

For This Documentary Tells Me So

The idea that documentaries are unbiased truth is well-established nonsense, of course, but some filmmakers are better at covering their ideological tracks than others (the good ones are, anyway). For the Bible Tells Me So tackles a tough, timely topic: the antagonism between Christian fundamentalists and practicing homosexuals. This complex subject deserved a more nuanced, reflective treatment than it’s given here. Daniel Karslake, the director, has made a warm and genial film that lands, quite predictably, on the ‘let’s all just get along’ platform. The majority of Christians have no problem following that prescription, but that doesn’t mean they’re ready to concede theological wrongheadedness.

Karslake stacks the deck in his favor. The best argument is usually a bait-and-switch: set up your opponent’s key points then systematically knock them down. Showing clips of sweaty, swaggering Jimmy Swaggart decrying gays as ‘abominations’ is is not exactly intellectual fair play. By contrast, someone like Gene Robinson, interviewed here as the first openly gay bishop in the Episcopal church, appears the paragon of composed lucidity. Robinson’s fundamentalist parents, an adorable elderly couple trying to reconcile their beliefs as Christians with an unconditional love for their child, are shown in a sympathetic light, testifying to Karslake’s appealing humanism. This humanism shores up his lack of intellectual rigor. Instead of pointed, penetrating conversations between well-informed, well-matched proponents of both sides, Karslake mostly sticks with soft human interest stuff: profiles of contentious parent-child relationships. These are affecting, anecdotally interesting stories, that don’t ultimately add anything to the larger debate.

Karslake attempts to settle the debate with an unctuous cartoon sequence featuring a buff, blonde gay man and butch lesbian telling the subtly named ‘Christian’, a meek-looking eunuch sporting an Argyle sweater, exactly why he’s an idiot. (Gays as much as Christians should be offended by the distasteful stereotypes—I kept expecting the blonde metrosexual to give Christian a make-over). The cartoon appears without preamble or commentary, so one can only assume that this is the filmmakers’ sound-bite summary of the movie: gays are hip and cool and up on the latest scientific findings; Christians are backwards dweebs. Christians, however, can earn some cool credibility (a pop culture version of redemption) if they embrace homosexuality.

Despite such sophomoric devices, For the Bible Tells Me So stunningly (or not?) earned a 100% fresh rating on Rottentomatoes.com—every single major critic recommended this documentary, deploying adjectives like ‘fair-minded’ and ‘thought-provoking.’ There’s isn’t much thought behind it, unfortunately, and any documentarian who wears his or her ideological agenda like an honor badge should consider other career options—marketing executive, for example. What the movie turns out to be is a well-meaning piece of propaganda, with an engaging cast of talking heads, but it’s a botched bit of reportage because all the talking heads essentially agree with one another (which is to say, they agree with the director, who assembled and edited the interviews), or they at least arrive at the same conclusion. In other words, why should anyone be convinced of the movie’s main points? For This Documentary Tells Me So. Gays and Christians alike deserve better.

Not Rated Yet
  • Currently Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Login or Register to rate this!

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

(4) COMMENTS

By Dave AT 09.15.08 01:04PM Not Rated

Dave

I actually happened to watch this documentary on Google Video and was struck by the parents of the bishop.

These people are obviously devout Christians and it must have been difficult (how could it not?) for them to accept their son’s sexuality in light of their deeply held beliefs.


By Fr. Larry Gearhart AT 09.15.08 03:33PM Not Rated

Fr. Larry Gearhart

It’s understandable that devout Christians and devout Jews would have a problem with a homosexual child choosing to adopt a gay or lesbian lifestyle.  Both the Torah and the Christian Bible declare this behavior to be an abomination.  Naturally, that doesn’t give pause to people like Bishop Robinson, who have endless tools for redaction.

This doesn’t help the general conversation between GLBTQ folks and people who believe this behavior is bad.  Most people who believe the behavior is bad do so because of the unremitting condemnation of it in the Judeo-Christian tradition.  They do so, however, largely without reflection on what is bad about it.  That’s where natural law considerations come in.

Unfortunately, natural law is the neglected science of our age, and if truth be told, it never a developed a scientific foundation.

As a result, we have a dialog which is not really a dialog.


By Vico AT 09.16.08 04:20PM Not Rated

Vico

Vico:
  It would very interesting to read Rev. Gearhart’s discussion of natural law, especially since he seems to think ordinary science ought to be connected somehow to natural law reasoning.


By chassup AT 09.18.08 09:12AM Not Rated

chassup

Perhaps I’m confused, but I was always taught that God’s laws prescribe the natural law, and that science is the study of the natural law in a very narrowly focussed search for Truth, not equipped to search outside the limits of the observable, measurable material universe.

I never understood why “natural law” was anathema for scientists.


LOGIN



Not a member?
Click to Register with GODSPY Register here


Forgot your password? Forgot your password?

POST A COMMENT (Login Required)



Faith at the Edge Traces